As a whole, we opinion a region court’s honor of attorney’s costs having an enthusiastic abuse from discretion
County Univ. v. Riley, 74 F.three dimensional 960, 963 (9th Cir.1996). Into the evaluating an offer out of realization wisdom, we need to dictate, enjoying the evidence in the light very favorable into nonmoving party, if or not there’s one legitimate dilemma of topic facts and if or not brand new area court truthfully used the appropriate substantive rules. Come across Covey v. Hollydale Mobilehome Locations, 116 F.3d 830, 834 (9th Cir.), revised of the 125 F.three dimensional 1281 (9th Cir.1997). The newest preclusive aftereffect of an earlier judgment was a point of laws subject to de- novo comment. FDIC v. Jenson (In the lso are Jenson), 980 F.2d 1254, 1256 (9th Cir.1992). See Side v. Asarco Inc., 114 F.three dimensional 986, 988 (9th Cir.1997). Continuar leyendo «I opinion the fresh area court’s offer from conclusion judgment de- novo»