My information about the brand new Oppenheimer case will come not simply from my head bekar boЕџanmД±Еџ kadД±nlarla tanД±Еџmak wedding on it, also courtesy my personal part for a few many years given that counsel with the AEC’s Department out of Cover and you may my personal close private relationship upcoming and because upcoming with a high AEC shelter authorities
Kenneth D. Nichols, the fresh AEC’s Standard Movie director, necessary with the Percentage that the Grey Board’s findings and you can testimonial from Could possibly get twenty-seven, 1954, end up being accepted, in addition to Commission on June 28, 1954, issued the four-to-you to definitely choice (Henry D. This new Oppenheimer circumstances made great societal controversy at that time, and over many years could have been the main topic of numerous guides and you can content. Most commentators has actually translated the truth due to the fact an effective vendetta to the part of Lewis L. Strauss, then-chairman of AEC, or out of military officials (generally the Air Force) up against Oppenheimer based on character and you can/or plan clashes. The most recent investigations, because of the Jack Holl, one of several official historians of the nuclear times program try demonstrated on Western Historical Association’s standard meeting for the December 1975.
Which investigations is likely to be considering significant credence on account of the brand new elite condition and you will stability of your own official historians and since the account is based on total, uninhibited accessibility AEC documents. Simply speaking, the Holl membership problems the view that the circumstances originated in a Strauss vendetta against Oppenheimer. Continuar leyendo «Smyth dissented) against maintenance off Oppenheimer’s clearance»
